Iran has rejected US President Donald Trump’s claim that he would soon declare the strategically important Strait of Hormuz a US territory, with Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi insisting that the waterway will remain under Iranian authority.
In a post on X, Gharibabadi said the Strait of Hormuz “has been Iranian, is Iranian, and will remain Iranian.” He further asserted that decisions concerning the opening and closing of the strategic maritime passage would be made by Iran
Iran has rejected US President Donald Trump’s claim that he would soon declare the strategically important Strait of Hormuz a US territory, with Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi insisting that the waterway will remain under Iranian authority.
In a post on X, Gharibabadi said the Strait of Hormuz “has been Iranian, is Iranian, and will remain Iranian.” He further asserted that Iran would make decisions concerning the opening and closing of the strategic maritime passage.
The remarks came a day after Trump said that, following what he described as the defeat of Iran, he would “pretty soon” declare the Strait of Hormuz a territory of the United States. Trump made the statement during an appearance in New York amid continuing tensions between Washington and Tehran.
The exchange has added another contentious dimension to the already strained US-Iran relationship, placing the strategically vital waterway at the centre of an increasingly acrimonious geopolitical dispute.
Iran Draws a Firm Line
Gharibabadi’s response was unequivocal. Tehran maintains that the waterway will remain under Iranian control and that Iran will determine when it is opened or closed.
The Iranian official also rejected the notion that the strait could simply be claimed through a political declaration or military pressure. His comments signal that Tehran sees control of the waterway as a core strategic issue rather than a negotiable administrative matter.
The dispute is unfolding against the backdrop of an ongoing conflict between Iran and the United States and a sharp reduction in maritime traffic through the strait. Reuters reported that vessel traffic had fallen substantially from pre-conflict levels, while the waterway remained a central point of contention between the two sides.
Why the Strait Matters
The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most strategically important maritime passages because of its role in global energy transportation. A prolonged disruption there can affect shipping, energy markets and fuel prices far beyond the Persian Gulf.
The current confrontation has therefore attracted attention well beyond Washington and Tehran. Countries with significant energy and maritime interests are closely monitoring developments, while diplomatic efforts have focused partly on restoring more predictable navigation through the waterway.
Recent reporting has indicated that discussions involving regional intermediaries have explored possible arrangements concerning maritime traffic, although disagreements over control remain substantial
Trump’s Territorial Claim
Trump’s statement represents a dramatic escalation in rhetoric over the waterway. The United States does not currently have formal territorial jurisdiction over the Strait of Hormuz, and Trump did not provide details explaining how such a declaration would be implemented
The statement nevertheless underscores Washington’s determination to challenge Iran’s control over maritime traffic during the current confrontation.
Iran, meanwhile, has shown little indication of accepting the proposed US position. Gharibabadi’s comments reinforce Tehran’s insistence that control over the strait remains an Iranian prerogative.
A Dispute With Wider Consequences
The confrontation over Hormuz is not simply a bilateral disagreement about a stretch of water. Its implications extend into international commerce, energy security and regional diplomacy.
Any sustained uncertainty surrounding maritime access can create additional pressure on shipping operators and energy markets. Recent reports have linked the disruption around the strait with higher fuel prices and considerable concern among countries dependent on Gulf energy supplies.
The competing claims also raise broader questions about maritime governance and the legal status of navigation through internationally important straits. Any lasting arrangement would therefore have to address not only the immediate political dispute but also the practical question of safe and predictable commercial passage.
For now, however, the positions of Washington and Tehran remain sharply opposed.
Trump says the United States could soon claim the Strait of Hormuz as its territory. Iran says the waterway will remain Iranian and that Tehran will retain authority over its opening and closure.
With the strategic waterway already at the heart of the wider confrontation, the latest exchange suggests that the dispute over Hormuz is likely to remain one of the most consequential issues in the unfolding US-Iran crisis